Neutrino Beams

work

How to Make a Neutrino Beam

Though we’ve been making neutrino beams for decades, they’re fundamentally difficult to control and monitor. Yet understanding them is critical to our experiments.

The trouble is primarily that neutrinos have no electrical charge, so they’re hard to manipulate, shape into beams, and monitor.

The strategy to create a neutrino beam is to use a proton beam to create pions which naturally decay into neutrinos: \pi \rightarrow \mu \rightarrow \nu_\mu.

Protons and pions are charged, so by steering those with magnets first, we have some control over neutrino direction and energy. Ideally, we’d have monoenergetic and highly collimated neutrino beams, but in practice that’s not possible, and our beams are wideband.

(Left) How to build a neutrino beam in two minutes (with cartoons). (Right) Neutrino beams are built with different energy peaks and detector see different flux shapes depending on where they’re placed.


REU students Haley Harms (UNI, IA) and Synnove Hunnes (Gustavus College, MN) developed beam monitor technology for the Short Baseline Neutrino Detector during Summer 2024.


Beam Simulation

To help understand our beam and quantify our uncertaintes, we use detailed models of the entire beamline and the relevant physics processes.

I’ve worked on many aspects of beam simulation and monitoring, but here I highlight how small asymmetries in the beamline apparatus can lead to complicated fluxes at your detector.

The neutrino heat map across the front face is very sensitive to neutrino energy. Lack of azimuthal symmetry is due to small asymmetries in the beam apparatus.


(Left) Average neutrino position moves as a function of neutrino energy. And these positions are sensitive to small movements in the beam apparatus. (Right) The impact of beam apparatus uncertainties on the MINERvA flux model.1
Back to top